Hi there, this is jus a general enquiry (which is why it's under the General Forum)...
When you open a number of documents in TextPad for example 15 documents, and you do a search for something and it comes back saying "3 Results Found".
Whilst Textpad leaves 'markers' by each instance of the result; I was wondering, it there a way you can jump straight to the found instances?
See the only way I know of doing it, is by going through all 15 documents, looking for the marker arrows. Is there a way I can jump through the markers one-by-one.
Cheers
KPS
Find in all documents - Markers
Moderators: AmigoJack, bbadmin, helios, Bob Hansen, MudGuard
that's on oddity
I specifically sought out this post here in this forum to find the new way of doing that very thing because I would have sworn upon a stack of whatever holy book you cherish that once-upon-a-time I was able to have multiple documents open at once, using the find function with the 'In All Documents' check-box checked and selecting the [Mark All] option to tag occurrences across all files, and then use the standard bookmark buttons on the Navigation toolbar to jump indiscriminately through those open documents from bookmark to bookmark. I have a need for this in my new job where I will often literally have 100s of source code files loaded at once and have to find each occurrence of specific tags in the applicable file set -- that obviously no longer occurs.
Regardless of my possible inaccurate accounting of functional history (maybe I only dreamed it), please strongly consider adding this to a future release of TextPad as the function is rather invaluable for folks that have to edit the way AK47wong and I apparently have to. As an alternative, if this did exist in a prior version and 'management' deems this a silly thing to add back in going forward please post the version I'm recounting so I can dig it up and run that instead. Whatever other bugs I would have to contend with would be worth it to have that functionality again.
I'm a long-time customer and love TextPad. I program for a living and TextPad is #2 of my 3 required productivity tools. My testimonials to colleages have surely generated their own sales ;).
Regardless of my possible inaccurate accounting of functional history (maybe I only dreamed it), please strongly consider adding this to a future release of TextPad as the function is rather invaluable for folks that have to edit the way AK47wong and I apparently have to. As an alternative, if this did exist in a prior version and 'management' deems this a silly thing to add back in going forward please post the version I'm recounting so I can dig it up and run that instead. Whatever other bugs I would have to contend with would be worth it to have that functionality again.
I'm a long-time customer and love TextPad. I program for a living and TextPad is #2 of my 3 required productivity tools. My testimonials to colleages have surely generated their own sales ;).
Sincerely,
-TnTousley
-TnTousley
or alternatively
It wouldn't be as graceful, but you could alternatively put a number in parenthesis next to the filename in the Document Selector Tool for the number of remaining bookmarks in a given file (i.e. "file.txt (2)" when there were two bookmarks).
Then even if the jumps were not automated, the bookmarks themselves would be easier to find than via a document-by-document pan-&-scan by the user.
You could even put the bookmark count text in a different color, like red or blue, or orange (or make it configurable in your classic motif). Even just making the file-name bold or a bigger font-size would be a most excellent value-add for the likes of us (ak47wong and I).
You could even do what was suggested before and this ^^, if you were so inclined.
Then even if the jumps were not automated, the bookmarks themselves would be easier to find than via a document-by-document pan-&-scan by the user.
You could even put the bookmark count text in a different color, like red or blue, or orange (or make it configurable in your classic motif). Even just making the file-name bold or a bigger font-size would be a most excellent value-add for the likes of us (ak47wong and I).
You could even do what was suggested before and this ^^, if you were so inclined.
Sincerely,
-TnTousley
-TnTousley