Wow...is 5.2 really garbage?
Moderators: AmigoJack, bbadmin, helios, Bob Hansen, MudGuard
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 4:39 pm
Wow...is 5.2 really garbage?
I just got a new machine (Vista Enterprise) and purchased 5.2. I installed it and every time I double-clicked any file associated with TextPad I got an error saying it could not find the file. What crap. I read various threads on here with various fixed and never got it to work. I uninstalled it and then installed 4.7.3 and it works like a charm. What gives? Does anyone know what is going on with this? Why do I have to use a version from 5 years ago?
By the way, I'm not trying to be offensive here. It is just that I've used the product for YEARS and have always loved it. But this debacle is just horrible. I installed on a virgin Vista Enterprise machine and it doesn't work, yet a version from 2003 works? Yuck.
By the way, I'm not trying to be offensive here. It is just that I've used the product for YEARS and have always loved it. But this debacle is just horrible. I installed on a virgin Vista Enterprise machine and it doesn't work, yet a version from 2003 works? Yuck.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 4:39 pm
I think the board is pretty active. You just have to strike the right tone.
According to this thread there will be maintenance upgrade some time. It might fix your problem.
Andrew
According to this thread there will be maintenance upgrade some time. It might fix your problem.
Andrew
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 4:39 pm
Still hoping for a maintenance release. How LONG has Vista been out? Come on guys. We paid for this software, it'd be nice if it worked on the platforms it is SUPPOSED to work on.
In hindsight I should've tested 5.2 out on Vista before I paid the money. But I'd had such good luck with 4.x on XP that it never occurred to me the new version would be BROKEN. And yes, when I double click on a txt (or other supported file type) get an error it is VERY much broken.
In hindsight I should've tested 5.2 out on Vista before I paid the money. But I'd had such good luck with 4.x on XP that it never occurred to me the new version would be BROKEN. And yes, when I double click on a txt (or other supported file type) get an error it is VERY much broken.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 4:39 pm
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 4:39 pm
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 4:39 pm
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 8:15 am
- Location: N. Ireland
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 4:39 pm
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 8:15 am
- Location: N. Ireland
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 4:39 pm
Boy, did I make a mistake. As you can gather from this thread, I could not get a 5.2.1 installation on a brand new Vista machine to work properly. File associations never worked correctly despite the fact that I was doing everything correctly. I had to go back to 4.7.3.
I've been happily using 4.7.3 for almost a year when I noticed today that a new version of Textpad was out. I thought I would take a chance. Wow--what a mistake.
I installed it and immediately began getting all of the same issues with file associations that could not be fixed through normal means. I ended up uninstalling and re-installing 4.7.3 and everything was STILL screwed up.
I ended up having to work for several hours using 3rd-party de-installation tools (to remove screwed-up registry entries) before I could get back to a working version of 4.7.3. It was horrible.
I still cannot figure out why 5.x works for some Vista users but not others. I installed a 5.x version on a Windows 7 machine I'm testing and it worked fine. Go figure.
I've been happily using 4.7.3 for almost a year when I noticed today that a new version of Textpad was out. I thought I would take a chance. Wow--what a mistake.
I installed it and immediately began getting all of the same issues with file associations that could not be fixed through normal means. I ended up uninstalling and re-installing 4.7.3 and everything was STILL screwed up.
I ended up having to work for several hours using 3rd-party de-installation tools (to remove screwed-up registry entries) before I could get back to a working version of 4.7.3. It was horrible.
I still cannot figure out why 5.x works for some Vista users but not others. I installed a 5.x version on a Windows 7 machine I'm testing and it worked fine. Go figure.