Community

Posted: **Sun Feb 15, 2009 1:42 pm**

zarfDLL.c(103) : Error: invalid simple type name destructor

not proficient at re's - this is a typical for my compiler, need to focus on what I am working on .... will try a regex to capture line number to show some work:

Code: Select all

^[:alnum:]+\.[:alnum:][(]\([:digit:]+\)

That's the best I can do, it does not look like re's given for capturing compiler line number for single click to line from "Tool Output" window.

Posted: **Sun Feb 15, 2009 9:06 pm**

I'm afraid I don't entirely understand your message. Please use simple language and leave out the obscurities.

But are you looking for something like

Regular expression to match output: ^([[:alnum:]]+\.[[:alnum:]])$([[:digit:]]+)$

Registers:
File: 1
Line: 2

or

Regular expression to match output: ^([a-z0-9]+\.[ch])$([0-9]+)$

Registers:
File: 1
Line: 2

?

Posted: **Mon Feb 16, 2009 4:27 am**

Code: Select all

zarfDLL.c(103) : Error: invalid simple type name destructor

It looks like you are trying to capture the code inside the parenthesis. You could use:

Find:::^[^$]+\(([^)]+)$.+$
Replace:::Error: \1

This would replace the entire line with "Error: 103" using the example, and ignore all parenthesis after the first set.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2009 6:10 am**

ben_josephs wrote:I'm afraid I don't entirely understand your message. Please use simple language and leave out the obscurities.

sorry, seemed pretty simple to me - re for jump to line on compiler diagnostic - first code block is a line I took as "typical"

What are the

Registers:
File: 1
Line: 2

? ... I have no idea what this is for nor where applies.

My apologies, no intent to be obscure.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2009 6:11 am**

Evil Bob wrote:It looks like you are trying to capture the code inside the parenthesis.

Yes, but I have no idea how these compiler jumps work so I was guessing....

Not a good idea to do that.

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:26 pm**

In Configure | Preferences | Tools | <Your tool>
set something similar to

Regular expression to match output: ^([a-z0-9]+\.[ch])$([0-9]+)$

Registers:
File: 1
Line: 2

The regex contains two sets of capturing parentheses. They are numbered from the left, starting at 1, by the positions of the opening parentheses. The "register" numbered n holds the text that was matched by the nth parenthesised regular subexpression.

Code: Select all

 1                  2
 |                  |
 V                  V
^([a-z0-9]+\.[ch])\(([0-9]+)\)

In Posix syntax, capturing parentheses are unescaped and literal parentheses are escaped. (In the default syntax it's the other way around.)

Posted: **Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:52 pm**

Okay, I think I grasp what is going on. Attempted a rewrite which I will try both this and what you posted. The first capture is any allowable filename under win, but the compiler only recognize dot c and dot cpp ( or h && hxx ) so the approach I took was first group is anything not opening paren in compiler std out, then try to get past that paren and capture line number in second grouping.

Code: Select all

^\([^(]+\)\(?(\)\([0-9]+\)
       ^    ^   ^ ^
       |    | |   | second grouping, for line number
       |    | | close "there but do not capture"
       |    | there but do not capture 
       | one or more not paren

I will try this and what you posted.

My apologies again, let me know if this is clearer post. I had just lost the machine totally and was coming back up, trying to continue working during system recovery.

Posted: **Thu Feb 19, 2009 2:04 pm**

Here's a corrected version of your regex:
^([^(]+)$([0-9]+)$

It assumes Posix regular expression syntax:

Configure | Preferences | Editor

[X] Use POSIX regular expression syntax

Posted: **Wed Feb 25, 2009 9:34 pm**

Okay, I have tried:

Code: Select all


 * ^[^0-9]+(\([0-9]+\)
 * ^([a-z0-9]+\.[c])\(([0-9]+)\) 
 * ^([a-z0-9]+\.[ch])(\([0-9]+\)) 
 * Here's a corrected version of your regex:
 * ^([^(]+)\(([0-9]+)\)

Those are directly from using the comments field in the source file as a fast short buffer. I have tried all of the above and am getting some jumps, about 20% or so it goes to the line number - I am considering trying to turn off trasparent dialog boxes in xp as clearly that calls into 16-bit non-renetrant code as does the tool output window, I am getting some builds and better jumps would be adjunct to coding effectiveness.

Posted: **Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:38 am**

What are the messages from your compiler that you are having trouble with?

I'm afraid I'm unclear what transparent dialogue boxes and 16-bit non-re-entrant code have to do with this problem, and I don't know what an adjunct to coding effectiveness is.

Posted: **Sat Feb 28, 2009 7:41 pm**

Code: Select all

zarfDLL.c(103) : Error: invalid simple type name destructor

is exactly the syntax I am trying to captue. Filename(line number) - enable hyper-jumps, in this example on line 103 of file zarfDLL.c an error is being reported "invalid simple type name destructor"

As for the other two matters, the name of this tool I am building "zarf" is a coffee holder for coffee that is too hot to handle so though it seems simple to me please disreguard the other two comments by me.

Posted: **Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:22 pm**

That is the same style as before, and that is what my suggestions were designed for. They both work.

Posted: **Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:20 pm**

Okay, I'm underway. Must be the double-click response - maybe there's a shortcut key .... Okay, it's f-4, issue retired.

Community

re for dm

re for dm

Re: re for dm

Re: re for dm

much clearer

partial result

posted

thanks