The regular expression "START.*END" does not work - period. This is the case whether START and END are on the same line or not
I cannot duplicate this problem.
===================================
Regex works fine for the following test lines
START some data, more data, to the END
START some data, more data, to the END
START some data, more data, to the END
START some data, more data, to the END
START some data, more data, to the END
START some data, more data, to the END
START some data, more data, to the END
START some other data, more other data, to the END
START somemore data, more different data, to the END
START some new data, more new data, to the END
START some old data, more old data, to the END
START some repeat data, more repeat data, to the END
START some unique data, more unique data, to the END
Searching for "START.*END" (without quotes) replaces each line with a blank line.
Searching for "START.*END\n" (without quotes) deletes each line completely.
Selection of POSIX does not matter, same results in both instances.
===============================
Steps taken to make this happen:
From the Main Menu, using Search, Replace, entering value into "Find What" field in the Replace window. Making sure the "Replace With" field is blank. Conditions box have selected "text" and "Regular expression", Scope has selected Active document. Click on Replace All.
Replacements happen as noted above.
Replacing "\n" with a unique value "~" also works on these lines. Using the Scope of Selected Text vs. Active document:
Select text, (lines 4-10)
Replace \n with ~ (combines to START.........END).
Select text (the block just modified START.....END)
Replace START.*END with nothing (all of line is replaced with blank line).
=====================================
If any of this is not working for you.....
What are your values, what steps are you taking? What are your results?
does not work - period
is a bit vague, no error message? no cursor movement? no focus change? Specifics are helpful here.
========================
that there isn't an interest in nailing down this problem.
If that were the case, there would have been no responses to your request. There must be some interest, the item has been looked at over 125 times.