What can EMACS do that Textpad can't do?
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 4:46 pm
I've been searching around the forum for a while, and i don't think this has been asked before. (if it has, i'm sorry)
I'm kind a' interested to learn what emacs can do that textpad can't. I've heard a lotta people banging on about what good editor emacs is, so i would like to know what excatly is so good about it, and why so many people has formed a religion around it. ...and textpad is my only frame of reference. (also to know what features i should miss in textpad - i allmost can't think of any)
(i know emacs UI pretty much sux, so don't tell me that textpad is superiour/moreStandartized in that aspect. Just wanna know which features that are in emacs that ain't in textpad or only are partly in textpad, not about emacs' ease of use)
So what can EMACS do that TextPad can't?
I'm kind a' interested to learn what emacs can do that textpad can't. I've heard a lotta people banging on about what good editor emacs is, so i would like to know what excatly is so good about it, and why so many people has formed a religion around it. ...and textpad is my only frame of reference. (also to know what features i should miss in textpad - i allmost can't think of any)
(i know emacs UI pretty much sux, so don't tell me that textpad is superiour/moreStandartized in that aspect. Just wanna know which features that are in emacs that ain't in textpad or only are partly in textpad, not about emacs' ease of use)
So what can EMACS do that TextPad can't?