Performance is terrible

General questions about using TextPad

Moderators: AmigoJack, bbadmin, helios, Bob Hansen, MudGuard

Post Reply
davew
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:59 pm

Performance is terrible

Post by davew »

I am running textpad 6.2.2(32 bit) on windows 7 64 bit laptop.
Recently (like in last month) Text pad has started to run very very slowly. almost making it unusable. I am talking seconds to highlight or enter aa character during which time the CPU monitor is showing 6-8% CPU usage by textpad.

I upgraded to latest version hoping it would go away but didn't.

I cannot think of any other system change that happened.

If I start a new document then performance is fine until I save it.

Anyone have any ideas what can be causing this?
User avatar
kengrubb
Posts: 324
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 5:23 pm
Location: Olympia, WA, USA

Post by kengrubb »

Have you tried virus scan, chkdsk, defrag?

I run TP 6.2.2, and I have used TP for about 13 years ever since 4.x

Unless you're loading up a file that is 50 MB or more, I cannot see TP being the culprit, and if you are loading up a file that is 50 MB or more, expect some delays.
(2[Bb]|[^2].|.[^Bb])

That is the question.
davew
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:59 pm

Post by davew »

I actually found something a bit more specific to this problem.
It seems to only occur when editing files in specific directories.
I have a folder C:\Work for instance with multiple sub directories and files there are slow where as editing files in other places are fine

I may try defragging the disk though as that hasnt been done for a while.
I am using McAfee anti virus.
Huxley
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 12:22 pm

McAfee real-time scanning ...

Post by Huxley »

I've been having problems with extreme slowness when TextPad is used to edit even simple text files. I've traced this to the 'real-time' scanning of McAfee software; when turned off, TextPad works fine!

Unfortunately, McAfee does not allow adding files in program folder to be added to the exclusion list. Looks like I need a different anti-virus!
Post Reply