Search found 5 matches
- Tue Sep 19, 2023 8:29 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Column number below scroll bar in 9.x
- Replies: 14
- Views: 21051
Re: Column number below scroll bar in 9.x
Can confirm it's working once again for me after the 9.3.1 update. Thanks for the fix!
- Thu Sep 07, 2023 6:05 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Column number below scroll bar in 9.x
- Replies: 14
- Views: 21051
Re: Column number below scroll bar in 9.x
Hello again, Sorry for the late response. Just tonight I have upgraded to version 9.3, and I still see the same issue. To answer some of your earlier questions: My display is 5120x1440 (super-ultrawide monitor) I have enabled the clock, and it does not show up in the status bar. The 'CAPS ...
- Wed Aug 09, 2023 5:29 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Column number below scroll bar in 9.x
- Replies: 14
- Views: 21051
Re: Column number below scroll bar in 9.x
What I notice after deleting GUIConfig.xml is that there is no longer a system bell sound when TextPad starts up. I suppose that's an improvement :) However, the status bar display is still not what either of us are expecting. This is Windows 11 Pro version 22H2, DirectX 12 if any of that matters ...
- Sun Aug 06, 2023 1:37 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Column number below scroll bar in 9.x
- Replies: 14
- Views: 21051
Re: Column number below scroll bar in 9.x
This is all that I see after the 9.2.3 upgrade. The status bar is definitely enabled. But the only informative thing that the status bar tells me is that X bytes are selected whenever I make a selection. The column number feature is sorely missed...
- Thu Jul 20, 2023 10:36 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Column number below scroll bar in 9.x
- Replies: 14
- Views: 21051
Column number below scroll bar in 9.x
One of the things that I notice after upgrading to 9.x is that the very bottom-most bar no longer displays the column I am typing at. This was a pretty useful feature. For example: I want to create a horizontal bar of characters in my document to separate two sections, and the bar must be exactly 78 ...